Suites Pricing verified August 2026

SEO by Daniel vs Advanced Web Ranking

Advanced Web Ranking tracks positions across 4,000+ engines and forecasts movement. SEO by Daniel scores site health. Different jobs, honestly compared.

August 7, 2026 · 4 min read

The short version

Advanced Web Ranking is a deep rank-tracking platform with 22+ years behind it, and it earns $139/month for rank work. SEO by Daniel does not track rankings. It scores site health and produces the client-ready report, which is the gap AWR leaves.

Competitor: Advanced Web Ranking · Pricing checked August 2026 from their site

Advanced Web Ranking is a rank-tracking specialist with more than 22 years behind it. It tracks positions across 4,000+ search engines and locations, adds geo-grids and forecasting, and is built for people whose job is rank data. SEO by Daniel does not track rankings at all. It scores the health of a site and produces a report a client can read. AWR answers where you rank; we answer what is broken and how bad it is.

Where Advanced Web Ranking wins

  • Rank tracking at scale. 4,000+ search engines and locations, with the granular position history serious rank work needs. If you report on visibility across markets, this is the core of the product.
  • Forecasting. AWR projects ranking movement rather than only recording the past. For an agency that sells forecasts to clients, that is a real differentiator.
  • Geo-grids. Local rank data by point on a map. For a multi-location business, a single national average hides the stores losing visibility.
  • Maturity. Over two decades in one niche. That shows in the depth of the data model and the reporting options you can build on top of it.

Where SEO by Daniel wins

  • It is instant and needs no account. Drop in a domain, get a 0-100 homepage score in about two seconds. AWR wants a project, keywords and a location before it produces anything.
  • Sitemap auto-discovery. We read robots.txt, follow nested sitemap indexes and handle gzipped sitemaps, so the whole site is found without configuration. AWR is looking at rankings, not crawling your site for issues.
  • A client-ready scored report. An executive summary, issues grouped by severity and CSV export. Rank tables tell a client where they sit, not what to fix on the page. If that is the gap, start with what the score means.
  • Price and shape. AWR's entry is from $139 per month. Ours starts at €19 per month with a 14-day trial and no card. One is a rank platform, the other a report product, and the budgets are not comparable.

A real example

A consultant runs rank tracking for a dental group with clinics across a large metro. She uses Advanced Web Ranking geo-grids to show each clinic owner how the practice appears in searches from their own neighbourhood, and the engine coverage lets her report on the regional search engines the group cares about. That is AWR doing exactly what it is paid for, and no audit tool replaces it.

The problem arrives on the monthly call. One clinic's page has dropped out of the local pack. The rank grid shows the fall but not the reason, so before the call she runs that domain through SEO by Daniel. The scan takes about two seconds and returns a 0-100 score with the drags listed by severity: a missing title tag on the location page, a canonical pointing at the old URL, and a slow image-heavy hero. Now the rank drop has a cause attached to it.

She keeps AWR for position history and the forecast, and adds the score line and the fix list to the same deck. The clinic owner gets the trend they asked for and the reason behind it. If you are weighing rank trackers instead of audit tools, ProRankTracker is the closer read.

The verdict

| | Advanced Web Ranking | SEO by Daniel | |---|---|---| | Core job | Rank tracking and forecasting | Scored site audit and report | | Search engines covered | 4,000+ | Not a rank tracker | | Instant no-account score | No | About two seconds | | Client-ready report + CSV | No | Yes | | Geo-grids | Yes | No | | Entry price | From $139/mo | €19/mo |

When to pick which

Pick Advanced Web Ranking when rank data is the deliverable: multi-market tracking, geo-grids, forecasting and position history you report on every month. If the client pays for visibility trends, the platform earns its entry price.

Pick SEO by Daniel when the question is site health rather than position, or when you need a scored report you can send today. The two sit in the same monthly deck more often than people expect. The freelancer roundup lists both, for different rows.

FAQ

Does SEO by Daniel track keyword rankings? No. Rank tracking is Advanced Web Ranking's specialism. SEO by Daniel scores a site's technical health and produces a client-ready report, which is a different job.

Is Advanced Web Ranking worth it for a freelancer? If you sell rank reporting across many markets and locations, the engine coverage and forecasting justify the entry price. If you mostly need an audit, the report product is the cheaper fit.

Can I use both? Yes. Rank tracking and site health answer different client questions. Many consultants keep a rank platform for the trend and add a scored audit for the explanation.

Run a free scan and see the health number your client has not asked about yet.

Check your own site

Run a free scan of your own site — no account, no card. Drop in a domain and get a 0-100 scored report in about two seconds.