AI content Pricing verified August 2026

SEO by Daniel vs Koala Writer

Koala Writer mass-produces AI articles cheaply; SEO by Daniel checks whether the site those articles live on can actually rank.

August 7, 2026 · 4 min read

The short version

Koala Writer is a cheap AI article generator, while SEO by Daniel audits the technical health of any website. Writing and inspecting are different jobs.

Competitor: Koala Writer · Pricing checked August 2026 from their site

Koala Writer is a cheap, one-click AI tool for producing long-form articles. You paste a topic or a URL and it writes. Verified pricing starts at $9 per month with 5,000 free words and no credit card. SEO by Daniel writes nothing. It scores the technical health of the site those articles are published on. Different jobs, same audience, and the mistake is assuming one covers the other.

Where Koala Writer wins

  • Verified pricing from $9 per month with 5,000 free words and no credit card makes it easy to try.
  • One-click long-form generation saves hours of drafting.
  • It can rewrite or expand existing content quickly, and rewriting a post is cheaper than commissioning a new one.
  • A monthly word allowance suits people who publish in volume.
  • At that price the cost per article is low enough to test topics you would otherwise skip.
  • It is built for people who care about output, not markup. You do not need an SEO background to get a usable draft.
  • Low commitment. There is no annual contract to sign.

Where SEO by Daniel wins

  • Drop any domain in and get a 0-100 homepage score in about two seconds, no account needed.
  • Sitemap auto-discovery finds every page via robots.txt, nested indexes and gzipped sitemaps on sites you did not build.
  • Client-ready scored reports with an executive summary, issues grouped by severity, and CSV export.
  • Published pricing: €19, €49 or €99 per month (yearly €190, €390, €790), with a 14-day trial and no credit card.
  • Continuous monitoring tracks technical health over time, independent of how many articles you generate.
  • The audit does not care who wrote the content. It grades the URLs, the templates and the crawl.
  • One score covers the whole site, which is easier to act on than a list of 200 articles.
  • It does not consume credits and it does not write, which is the whole point of running it next to Koala.

A real example

An affiliate site owner publishes 30 Koala articles a month. Sessions climb to about 4,000 and then stall. He assumes the content is too thin, so he writes 30 more. The number does not move.

He runs the domain through SEO by Daniel instead of opening Koala again. The audit finds that roughly 60% of posts are orphaned, with no internal links pointing to them. Pagination generates duplicate canonical tags. The sitemap lists only the first 100 posts, so everything published after that is invisible to the crawler.

Koala wrote 200 articles. Nobody checked whether half of them were reachable. The fix was not more words; it was internal linking, a canonical cleanup, and regenerating the sitemap. That is a technical audit, not a writing tool. The same thing happens on sites that never publish at volume, but content factories hit it fastest.

He fixes the internal links, cleans the canonicals, and regenerates the sitemap from the CMS. The next 30 articles each get an internal link from at least one existing post before they go live. Sessions start climbing again within two months, and the same articles that looked dead now pull traffic. The content was never the problem. The site just could not surface it.

The verdict

| | Koala Writer | SEO by Daniel | |---|---|---| | Job | AI article generation | Technical website audit | | Entry price | From $9/mo | From €19/mo | | Instant no-account score | No | Yes | | Writes content | Yes | No | | Client-ready report + CSV | No | Yes | | Sitemap discovery | Not its job | Automatic | | Credits or allowance | Monthly word allowance | None |

When to pick which

Pick Koala Writer when the bottleneck is producing article volume cheaply and you want a one-click writer with no minimum commitment. It does that job with very little friction, and the price makes it easy to test.

Pick SEO by Daniel when you need a fast, scored, technical audit of the site those articles live on. A Koala article still needs a crawlable, indexable, reasonably fast site to rank. If you only ever publish a dozen posts, a manual check may be enough. The audit pays off once volume hides problems, which is exactly the point where a content factory stops compounding.

FAQ

Does Koala Writer check my site? No. It generates articles. It does not crawl your domain for indexation, speed, or internal linking problems.

Can I use both? Yes, and most people should. Koala for the words, SEO by Daniel for the site the words are published on. The order is not fixed; run the audit whenever traffic stalls.

Is SEO by Daniel a content tool? No. It produces a scored audit and a CSV, not articles. There is no writing feature.

Point it at your domain and see whether the site is the problem: run a free scan.

Check your own site

Run a free scan and see what a scored report looks like in seconds. Drop in a domain and get a 0-100 scored report in about two seconds.