Report Garden is a low-cost reporting layer over data you already have; SEO by Daniel produces the audit data itself.
August 7, 2026 · 4 min read
The short version
Report Garden is a low-cost reporting layer; SEO by Daniel does its own crawling and scoring.
Competitor: Report Garden · Pricing checked August 2026 from their site
Report Garden is a budget reporting tool. It takes the metrics you already collect, drops them into multi-channel dashboards, and presents them through white-label client portals. SEO by Daniel is the opposite end of the pipe. It crawls a site, scores it out of 100, and writes the audit. Report Garden shows data you have. SEO by Daniel creates data you did not have. That is the difference, and it is a layer apart.
A one-person agency runs lean. He already pays for GA4, Search Console and a rank tracker. Report Garden wraps those into a branded portal for each client, which is cheaper than building his own.
The gap shows up on the first call with a new client. The portal has traffic and positions, but the client asks what is actually wrong with the site. Nothing he has connected answers that, because none of those tools crawl and score the site.
He adds SEO by Daniel to the intake. New client domain, free scan, then a full audit. The homepage scores 63. He exports the CSV and drops the scored summary into the Report Garden portal as the SEO section, beside the traffic and rank data. The client now gets a health score and a fix list in the same branded report. Report Garden kept the reporting cheap. SEO by Daniel supplied the audit that made the report worth reading.
The audit flagged nine pages with titles over the length limit and a stale redirect on the old services page. That gave him a to-do list before the kickoff call, and a reason to charge for the audit line, because the scored summary is clearly work rather than a repackaged dashboard.
| | Report Garden | SEO by Daniel | |---|---|---| | Layer | Reporting over connected sources | Crawling, scoring, audit report | | Own SEO crawler | No | Yes | | Free scan, no account | No | Yes, about two seconds | | Client-ready 0-100 report | No, dashboards of existing data | Generated, with executive summary and CSV | | Sitemap auto-discovery | No | Automatic | | White-label portals | Yes | Not the focus | | Entry price | Not published | €19/mo |
Pick Report Garden if you already collect the data elsewhere and only need a cheap, branded layer to present it to clients. It keeps reporting costs down and stays out of the way. The cheap layer stays cheap only if the data already exists.
Pick SEO by Daniel if the data itself is the missing piece. It crawls and scores the site, and the resulting report can sit inside whatever portal you already use.
Does Report Garden audit websites? No. It reports on data from sources you connect. It does not crawl or score a site on its own.
Can the two work together? Yes. Run SEO by Daniel for the audit, export the CSV or scored report, and present it in Report Garden alongside your other channels there.
Is SEO by Daniel a replacement for Report Garden? No. It produces one kind of data and does not host multi-channel client portals. If you need the portal, keep Report Garden.
Scan a domain free and see what the audit adds to the client report.
Run a free scan and see what a scored report looks like in seconds. Drop in a domain and get a 0-100 scored report in about two seconds.
White-label reporting
AgencyAnalytics is the agency reporting layer that aggregates your sources; SEO by Daniel is the crawler that produces the audit data.
White-label reporting
DashThis aggregates 30+ sources into marketing dashboards; SEO by Daniel crawls and scores the site to supply the audit those dashboards lack.
White-label reporting
Whatagraph is a cross-channel data hub with AI features; SEO by Daniel is the crawler and scored audit that supplies SEO data to a hub like it.